REKOMENDASI STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN LANSKAP PUBLIK RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DAN BIRU DI KOTA BOGOR
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has significantly restricted people's movement and outdoor activities, leading to boredom due to our social nature. However, in this context, public spaces in the form of green open spaces and blue open spaces emerge as potential solutions to increase immunity and public health. As we move into the post-pandemic era, the importance of sustainability and the availability of public green open spaces is becoming increasingly pronounced. This study, therefore, aims to develop a management strategy for green and blue open spaces in various segments of the central Cisadane watershed in Bogor City. The methods employed include analytical hierarchy process and field surveys. The analysis results reveal that the primary function of public green open space is as a landscape aesthetic, highlighting the aesthetic value of these spaces. The upper segment focuses on the production function, while the middle and lower segments concentrate on the carbon sink and storage functions. The proposed management strategy promotes agricultural tourism and regulates the urban microclimate, offering valuable insights that are crucial for post-pandemic urban planning and will help the audience feel informed and prepared for the future.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Arifin HS, Nakagoshi N. 2011. Landscape ecology and urban biodiversity in tropical Indonesian cities. J Landscape and Ecological Engineering. 7(1): 33-43. doi: 10.1007/s11355-010-0145-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0145-9
Arifin HS, Kaswanto. 2023. Manajemen Ruang Terbuka Biru untuk Pengendali Banjir. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.
Arifin HS. 2015. Revitalisasi Ruang Terbuka Biru sebagai Upaya Manajemen Lanskap pada Skala Bio-Regional. J Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 1(3): 172-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v1i3.10294
Arkham HS, Arifin HS, Kaswanto RL. 2014. Strategi Pengelolaan Lanskap Ruang Terbuka Biru di Daerah Aliran Sungai Ciliwung. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 6(1): 1-5. doi: 10.29244/jli.v6i1.18125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v6i1.18125
Darmawan E. 2007. Peranan Ruang Publik dalam Perancangan Kota (Urban Design). Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar 2007. Semarang (ID): Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro.
Efendi H, Kaswanto RL, Wardiatno Y, Bengen DG, Setiawan BI, Pawitan H, Soetarto E, Damayanthi E, Arifin HS, Widanarni. 2022. Water Front City: Kota Tepian Air Ramah Lingkungan. Policy Brief Dewan Guru Besar IPB University.
Faradilla E, Kaswanto RL, Arifin HS. 2018. Analisis kesesuaian lahan untuk ruang terbuka hijau dan ruang terbuka biru di Sentul City, Bogor. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia. 9(2): 101-109. doi: 10.29244/jli.v9i2.17398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v9i2.17398
Kaswanto RL. 2015. Land suitability for agrotourism through agriculture, tourism, beautification and amenity (ATBA) method. Proc Env. 24: 35–38. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.03.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.03.006
Kaswanto RL, Ilmi RM, Nurhayati HSA., 2023. Waterfront city management to realize low carbon landscape in Pekanbaru City, Indonesia. International Journal of Conservation Science. 14(3): 1151-1162. doi: 10.36868/IJCS.2023.03.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36868/IJCS.2023.03.24
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2007. Undang - Undang No 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang. Jakarta (ID): Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Peraturan Daerah Kota Bogor. No. 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Bogor 2011– 2031. Bogor (ID): Pemerintah Kota Bogor.
Ramdhan M, Arifin HS, Suharnoto Y, Tarigan SD. 2018. Penilaian indeks kota ramah air untuk Kota Bogor untuk Penyusunan Strategi Kebijakan. J Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 5(1): 27-38. doi: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.28757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.28757
Rau JG, Wooten DC. 1980. Enviromental Impact Analysis Handbook. United States of America (US): Kingsport press.
Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Services Sciences. 1(1): 83-98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Susanti WD. 2014. Faktor‐faktor yang mempengaruhi pemanfaatan ruang terbuka publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Lingkungan. 6(1): 29‐36.
Ugolini F, Massetti L, Calaza-Martínez P, Cariñanos P, Dobbs C, Ostoic SK, Marin AM, Pearlmutter D, Saaroni H, Šaulienė I, Simoneti M. 2020. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: An international exploratory study. Urban forestry & urban greening. 56 (1): 126. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888
Xie J, Luo S, Furuya K, Sun D. 2020. Urban parks as green buffers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain. 12(17): 1-17. doi: 10.3390/su12176751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176751
Copyright (c) 2024 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
