EVALUASI INDEKS KINERJA PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH (IKPS) DAN STRATEGI EFEKTIF PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH KOTA DEPOK
Abstrak
Pengelolaan sampah kota di Indonesia, khususnya di Kota Depok, menghadapi tantangan besar akibat pertumbuhan populasi dan ekonomi yang pesat. Sistem pengelolaan sampah yang tidak efektif menyebabkan berbagai masalah lingkungan, kesehatan, dan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas tata kelola persampahan di Kota Depok serta menyusun rekomendasi kebijakan yang mendukung pengelolaan persampahan yang berkelanjutan. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan Indeks Kinerja Pengelolaan Sampah (IKPS) yang dikembangkan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Sampah, Limbah dan B3 KLHK. Metode penelitian mencakup pengumpulan data dari berbagai sumber, seperti studi literatur, data lapangan dari wawancara dan survei, serta referensi pustaka dan jurnal. Data dikumpulkan dari September hingga Desember 2023 dengan melibatkan instansi terkait seperti Bappeda Kota Depok, DLHK Kota Depok, dan pengelola infrastruktur persampahan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Kota Depok masih memerlukan peningkatan dalam aspek kebijakan, sumber daya manusia, sarana dan prasarana, anggaran, serta partisipasi masyarakat. Beberapa rekomendasi kebijakan diajukan untuk mengatasi tantangan ini, termasuk evaluasi dan revisi peraturan daerah untuk memperkuat implementasi konsep 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle), peningkatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, pemeliharaan rutin sarana prasarana, pendirian lebih banyak bank sampah dan TPS 3R, peningkatan alokasi anggaran pengelolaan sampah dalam APBD, dan kampanye pengelolaan sampah yang lebih intensif dengan partisipasi aktif masyarakat. Temuan ini diharapkan dapat membantu Pemerintah Kota Depok dalam mengoptimalkan pengelolaan sampah untuk mencapai pembangunan berkelanjutan.
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Unduh
Referensi
Alawiyah T, Hadinata F, Saputra D, Ngudiantoro N. 2023. Comparing greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management scenarios: A case of Palembang, Indonesia. Sriwijaya Journal of Environment. 8(1): 42-47. doi: 10.22135/sje.2023.8.1.42-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22135/sje.2023.8.1.42-47
Arisman, Fatimah YA. 2023. Waste Management in Indonesia: Strategies and Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Circular Economy. In: Ghosh, S.K., Ghosh, S.K. (eds) Circular economy adoption. Singapore: Spinger. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-4803-1_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4803-1_5
Aulia R, Kaswanto RL, Arifin HS, Mosyaftiani A, Syasita N, Wahyu A, Wiyoga H. 2023. Assessing the benefits and management of urban forest in supporting low carbon city in Jakarta, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 24: 6151-6159. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d241136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d241136
Avarand N, Tavakoli B. Mahdiany Bora, K. 2023. Life cycle assessment of urban waste management in Rasht, Iran. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 19(5): 1385-1393. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4751
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2022. Jumlah Penduduk Kota Depok menurut Kecamatan: https://depokkota.bps.go.id/indicator/12/30/1/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-kecamatan-dan-jenis-kelamin-.html [18 Mei2024].
Efendi H, Kaswanto RL, Wardiatno Y, Bengen DG, Setiawan BI, Pawitan H, Soetarto E, Damayanthi E, Arifin, HS, Widanarni. 2022. Water Front City: Kota Tepian Air Ramah Lingkungan. Policy Brief Dewan Guru Besar IPB University.
Ferronato N, Torretta V. 2019. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. Internasional Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(6): 1060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060
Fitriana AF, Kaswanto RL, Nurhayati HSA. 2023. Strategi manajemen lanskap yang dikembangkan pada taman kota di Kota Purwokerto. SPACE. 10(2): 259-280. doi: 10.24843/JRS.2023.v10.i02.p09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/JRS.2023.v10.i02.p09
Ghaffar SH, Burman M, Braimah N. 2019. Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production. 244: 118710. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118710
Kaswanto RL, Ilmi RM, Nurhayati HSA., 2023. Waterfront city management to realize low carbon landscape in Pekanbaru City, Indonesia. International Journal of Conservation Science. 14(3): 1151-1162. doi: 10.36868/IJCS.2023.03.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36868/IJCS.2023.03.24
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. 2019. Low Carbon Development A Paradigm Shift Towards a Green Economy in Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): Bappenas.
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. 2020. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah (RPJMN) 2020-2024.
Kristanto GA, Koven W. 2019. Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management in Depok, Indonesia. City and Environment Interactions. 4: 100027. doi: 10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100027
Maesarini IW, Setiawan D, Dewi MP. 2020. Strategi gerebek sampah pemerintah Kota Depok menuju kota bebas sampah tahun 2020. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi. 7(2): 107-112. doi: 10.31334/reformasi.v7i2.1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v7i2.1060
Napitupulu MH, Muhyidin A. 2021. Tantangan partisipasi pemangku kepentingan dalam tata kelola sampah kota berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota. 17(4): 385-397. doi: 10.14710/pwk.v17i4.34438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i4.34438
Sandora RM, Ahmad AG, Wulandari S, Ahmed A, Nugroho SB. 2011. Enlargement and sustainability of municipal solid waste composting in megacity: a case study for Surabaya City. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 18(2): 7-17.
Setiadi A. 2015. Studi pengelolaan sampah berbasis komunitas pada kawasan permukiman perkotaan di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan. 3(1): 27-38. doi: 10.14710/jwl.3.1.27-38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.3.1.27-38
Shaffitri LR, Syaukat Y, Ekayani M. 2016. Peranan Bumdes dalam pengelolaan limbah cair tahu dan pemanfaatan biogas. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 2(2): 136-143. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jkebijakan/article/view/10984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v2i2.10984
Siswono A, Syaufina L, Badriyah, Rushayati S. 2022. Aplikasi teori planned behavior di SMAK dan SMTI sebagai implementasi kebijakan lingkungan Kementerian Perindustrian. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. doi: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i1.28957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i1.28957
Wangke F. 2023. Optimalisasi faktor modal untuk mendukung bisnis pengelolaan sampah, limbah, dan daur ulang di Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. doi: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i2.48405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i2.48405
Wati FR, Rizqi AM, Iqbal MI, Langi SS, Putri DN. 2021. Efektivitas kebijakan pengelolaan sampah berbasis tempat pengelolaan sampah terpadu 3R di Indonesia. PERSPEKTIF. 10(1): 195–203. doi: 10.31289/perspektif.v10i1.4296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v10i1.4296
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
