Sistem Pemasaran Beras Di Kabupaten Landak, Provinsi Kalimantan Barat
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Landak regency has potential to develop rice with productivity surplus 52.296 tons. Increased production must be balanced with the right marketing system so the farmer and seller could gain better profit level. This study aims to analyze channel, function and the operational efficiency (marketing margin, farmer’s share, profit ratio) rice in Landak Regency. This study took 45 farmers respondents sample using purposive sampling method and 13 marketing agencies using snowball sampling method. Qualitative data processing used to analyze marketing channels and marketing institutions. Quantitative data processing used to analyze marketing margin, farmer’s share, and the ratio of benefits to costs. The research results showed that there are five marketing channel and four marketing institution involved. The marketing channel distinguished by the product from the farmer which is marketing channel 1, 2 and 3 the farmer selling the paddy (raw rice) and marketing channel 4 and 5 the farmer selling rice. The analysis of operational efficiency showed that marketing channel that relative efficient were channel 1 based on its ratio of benefit to cost that has value >1 (profitable). Improvement the institutional role of farmers such group transactions can help farmers receive more profitable price.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author submitting the manuscript must understand and agree that the copyright of the article manuscript must be submitted/transferred to the Journal Forum Agribisnis. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) International License in which the Author and Reader can copy and redistribute the material in any media or format, and remix, modify and build material for any purpose, but they must provide appropriate credit (citing articles or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate whether there is a change. If you mix, change, or create material, you must distribute your contribution under the same license as the original.
References
Arbi M, Thirtawati, Junaidi Y. 2018. Analisis saluran dan tingkat efisiensi pemasaran beras semi organik di Kecamatan Rambutan Kabupaten Banyuasin. JSEP. 11(1): 22-32.
Ariwibowo A. 2013. Analisis rantai distribusi komoditas padi dan beras di Kecamatan Pati Kabupaten Pati. Economics Development Analysis Journal. 2(2): 1-9.
Ashari. 2009. Peran perbankan nasional dalam pembiayaan sector pertanian di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. 27(1): 13-27.
Asmarantaka RW. 2014. Pemasaran Agribisnis (Agrimarketing). Bogor: IPB Press.
Asmarantaka RW, Atmakusuma J, Muflikh YN, Rosiana N. 2017. Konsep pemasaran agribisnis: pendekatan ekonomi dan manajemen. J Agribisnis Indones. 5(2):151-172.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Luas panen dan produksi padi di Indonesia 2021 [internet]. [diacu 20 April 2022]. Tersedia dari: http://www.bps.go.id/publication/2022/07/12/c52d5cebe530c363d0ea4198/luas-panen-dan-produksi-padi-di-indonesia-2021.html.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Kabupaten Landak Dalam Angka. Ngabang: BPS Kabupaten Landak.
Codjo OS, Acclassato D, Fiamohe R, Kpenavoun S, Biaou G. 2019. Comparative analysis of the preference of producers and processors for domestic rice production contracts in Benin. Agribusines. doi: 10.1002/agr.21618.
Dahri, Hutagaol P, Siregar H, Simatupang P. 2015. Dampak kredit program KKPE dalam pengembangan usaha ternak sapi di tingkat peternak di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Manajemen dan Agribisnis. 12(2). 115-125. doi: 10.17358/JMA.12.2.115.
Dewi N, Yusri J, Saputra AJ. 2017. Analisis struktur perilaku dan kinerja pasar (structure, conduct and market performance) komoditi padi di Desa Bunga Raya dan Desa Kemuning Muda Kecamatan Bunga Raya Kabupaten Siak. Jurnal Agribisnis. 19(1):42-56.
Feryanto, Rosiana N. 2021. Penggunaan telepon seluler untuk pemasaran serta dampaknya terhadap kesejahteraan petani. Jurnal AGRISEP. 20(1): 25-42. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.20.1.25-40.
Firdaus FR, Baga LM. 2019. Analisis kinerja dan partisipasi anggota koperasi mandiri jaya Kabupaten Bogor. Forum Agribisnis. 9(2), 123-142. doi: 10.29244/fagb.9.2.123-142.
Fuad MS, Masithoh S, Nahraeni W. 2018. Persepsi peternak dan pola pemasaran sapi potong. Jurnal Agribisains. 4(1).
Gona A, Khalid A, Maikasuwa M.A. 2020. Structure, conduct and performance of rice marketing in Kebbi State, Nigeria. European Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Res. 8(2):1-11.
Herawati, Harianto. 2021. Pola perubahan harga dan marjin pemasaran bahan pangan di masa pandemi Covid-19. J Agribisnis Indones. 9(2):188-199. doi: 10.29244/jai.2021.9.2.188-199.
Hestina J, Nurmalina R, Suharno. 2017. Analisis efisiensi teknis usahatani padi di Jawa dan Luar Jawa: pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Forum Agribisnis. 7(2): 103-118.
Hidrobo M, Palloni G, Aker JC, Gilligan DO, Ledlie N. 2021. Paying for Digital Information: Assessing Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for a Digital Agriculture and Nutrition Service in Ghana. The University of Chicago Press Journals. 70(4). doi: 10.1086/713974.
Hilalullaily R. Kusnadi N, Rachmina D. 2021. Analisis efisiensi usahatani padi di Jawa dan luar Jawa, kajian prospek peningkatan produksi padi nasional. JAI. 9(2):143-153. doi:10.29244/jai.2021.9.2.143-153.
Lasitya DS, Irwandi P, Kharisudin A. 2022. Analisis saluran dan margin pemasaran beras di Kecamatan Sukorejo Kabupaten Pasuruan. JEPA. 7(1):169-176.
Maharani E, Edwina S, Sujeri S. Analisis pemasaran padi sawah di Desa Kemuning Muda Kecamatan Bungaraya Kabupaten Siak. IJAE. 5(1):56-72.
Ma W, Zhou X, Liu M. 2019. What drives farmers’ willingness to adopt e‐commerce in rural China? The role of internet use. Agribusiness. 1-5. doi: 10.1002/agr.21624.
Pham TT, Theuvsen L, Otter V. 2019. Determinants of smallholder farmers’ marketing channel choice: evidence from the Vietnamese rice sector. Asian Economic Journal. 33(3):281-300.
PIHPS. 2022. Tabel harga komoditas beras. https://hargapangan.id/tabel-harga/pasar-modern/komoditas , [diakses pada 28-03-2022 pukul 9.15 am].
Rachmasuciana DY, Darwanto DH, Masyuri. 2015. Pengaruh pengadaan beras dan operasi pasar terhadap harga beras dalam negeri. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 26(2): 129-138.
Rahman YA, Sfitri R, Cahyono ED. 2020. Motif petani dalam memilih pasar (Kasus di Sub Terminal Agribisnis Terpadu Taniran Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Selatan). Jurnal SEPA. 17(1): 33-39. doi: 10.20961/sepa.v17i1.39652.
Riyadh MI. 2018. Analisis saluran pemasaran lima pangan pokok dan penting di lima Kabupaten Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik. 9(2):161-171.
Saragih AE, Tinaprilla N, Rifin A. 2017. Rantai pasok produk beras di Kecamatan Cibeber, Kabupaten Cianjur. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis. 14(3):218-229. doi:10.17358/jma.14.3.218.
Sari EM, Hasyim AI, Situmorang S. 2019. Analisis efisiensi pemasaran gabah dan nilai tambah beras di Kabupaten Pesawaran. JIIA. 7(1): 6-13.
Silaban RR, Yuliawati. 2019. Analisis pemasaran beras di Kecamatan Sidorejo Kota Salatiga. Zira’ah. 44(3):291-300.
Sultana A. 2012. Rice marketing in Bangladesh: From the perspective of village study at Cox’s Bazar district. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7(45):5.995-6.004. doi: 10.5897/AJAR12.1840
Ulfa AM, Masyhuri. 2018. Efisiensi pemasaran beras di Kabupaten Sragen. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 29(2):287-298. doi:10.22146/ae.36442.
Wahyuni MA, Kariada K, Darmawati AAIM. 2021. Analisis distribusi pasar dan margin pemasaran gabah – beras dalam ketahanan pangan di Bali. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis. 9(2): 477-489.
Yonida AD, Hardyastuti S, Masyuri. 2020. Organic rice marketing in Purworejo Regency, Central Java Province. Journal of Agribusiness Management and Development. 1(1): 109-114.
Yuniarti D, Rahayu ES, Harisudin M. 2017. Saluran pemasaran beras organik di Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. 1(2):112-121.
Zimah UA, Herawati, Aviny EY. 2022. Analisis pendapatan usahatani padi di berdasarkan setatus penguasaan lahan di Kecamatan Grabag Kabupaten Purworejo. Forum Agribisnis. 13(1): 78-85. doi: 10.29244/fagb.13.1.78-85.