• Muhammad Iqbal Al Qodri Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi, Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680
  • Widyastutik Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, IPB University Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680
Keywords: Electric vehicles, Electric vehicle policy, Transportation policy, Emissions, Comparative studies


China and Indonesia are countries with large populations and contributors to world carbon dioxide emissions. One step to reduce emissions is through the adoption of electric vehicle policies. The penetration rate of electric vehicles in China and Indonesia can differ due to the policy approach used. In this study, the analysis method is a bilateral comparative study with a literature review. Based on the results of the analysis, China has adopted an electric vehicle policy since 2001 accompanied by sustainable programs and incentives. Meanwhile, Indonesia has only focused on electric vehicles, especially battery-based electric motor vehicles since 2019. Through the market approach (demand and supply) and infrastructure approach, different policy conditions in China and Indonesia are obtained, and can be used as a benchmark for decision-making for the Indonesian government. The policy implications of the analysis are increasing monetary and non-monetary incentives for producers and consumers, increasing local government participation, and clarifying the steps to execute Indonesia's electric vehicle roadmap.


Metrics Loading ...


Download data is not yet available.


Alqodri, M.I., Widyastutik. 2023. Low emission policies of G20 member countries and export performance of indonesian motor vehicles. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 12(1), 41-68. https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.12.1.2023.41-68.

Chen, Z., Fan, Z., Zhao, X. 2022. Toward supply side incentive: The impact of government schemes on a vehicle manufacturer's adoption of electric vehicles. International Transactions in Operational Research, 29(6), 3565-3591. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13133.

Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Banja, M., Olivier, J.G.J., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., Vignati, E. 2021. GHG Emissions of All World Countries-2021 Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

[Gaikindo] Gabungan Industri Kendaraan Bermotor Indonesia. 2022. Mobil Listrik di RI Terjual 2.803 Unit, Wuling Air ev Paling Laris. https://www.gaikindo.or.id/mobil-listrik-di-ri-terjual-2-803-unit-wuling-air-ev-paling-laris/

He, J., Yin, W. 2021. Policy Analysis of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry Policy. Dalam Appolloni, A., Caracciolo, F., Ding, Z., Gogas, P., Huang, G., Nartea, G., Ngo, T., Striełkowski, W.Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (hlm. 3247-3252). Atlantis Press International B.V.

Huang, Y., Chen, Y. 2017. The Review of Technology Industry Policy about New Energy Vehicles in China since the New Century. Dalam Chan et al. Proceedings of the Advances in Materials, Machinery, Electrical Engineering (AMMEE 2017) (hlm. 616-623). Atlantis Press.

Hwang, S.K. 2015. Comparative study on electric vehicle policies between Korea and EU Countries. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 7(4), 692-702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/927/1/012003.

[IEA] International Energy Agency. 2021. Share of low-carbon sources and coal in world electricity generation, 1971-2021.

[IEA] International Energy Agency. 2022a. Enhancing Indonesia’s Power System. https://www.iea.org/reports/enhancing-indonesias-power-system.

[IEA] International Energy Agency. 2022b. Global EV Outlook 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2022.

Levay, P.Z., Drossinos, Y., Thiel, C. 2017. The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy, 105, 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.054.

Li, W., Ruyin, L., Hong, C., Feiyu, C., Xiao, Z., Muyi, Y. 2019. Effect of policy incentives on the uptake of electric vehicles in China. Sustainability, 11(12), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123323.

Mock, P., Yang, Z. 2014. Driving Electrification: A Global Comparison Of Fiscal Incentive Policy For Electric Vehicles. Washington: International Council on Clean Transportation.

[NBS] National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2022. Statistical Bulletin of the National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China in 2022.

Nugroho, S.B., Zusman, E., Nakano, R., Takahashi, K., Koakutsu, K., Kaswanto, R.L., Arifin, N., Munandar, A., Arifin, H.S., Muchtar, M., Gomi, K. 2017a. The effect of prepaid electricity system on household energy consumption–the case of Bogor, Indonesia. Procedia Engineering, 198: 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.117.

Nugroho, S.B., Zusman, E., Nakano, R., Takahashi, K., Kaswanto, R.L., Arifin, H.S., Arifin, N., Munandar, A., Muchtar, M., Gomi, K., Fujita, T. 2017b. Exploring influential factors on transition process of vehicle ownership in developing asian city, a case study in Bogor City Indonesia. IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 674-679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2017.8317966.

Onofrei, M., Vatamanu, A.F., Cigu, E. 2022. The relationship between economic growth and CO2 Emissions in EU Countries: A cointegration analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.934885.

Palmer, K., Tate, J.E., Wadud, Z., Nellthorp, J. 2018. Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan. Applied Energy, 209, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.089.

Setiawan, I.C. 2019. Policy simulation of electricity-based vehicle utilization in Indonesia. Automotive Experiences, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31603/ae.v2i1.2020.

Simbolon, A.M., Rusli, B., Candardewini. 2022. Kebijakan kendaraan listrik dalam perspektif pasar dan infrastruktur: studi reviu komparasi bilateral Korea Selatan dan Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 24(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.25104/jptd.v24i2.1943.

Spentzas, C.N. 1993. Towards an electric vehicle policy. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 14(23), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.1993.061828.

Risyani, I., Bahtiar, R. 2022. Estimasi nilai pajak emisi kendaraan angkutan kota di Kota Bogor. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 9(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i3.34830.

Wang, D., Li, Y. 2022. Measuring the policy effectiveness of China’s new-energy vehicle industry and its differential impact on supply and demand markets. Sustainability, 14(13), 8215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14138215.

Wang, G. Zhu, Q. 2022. Wuling Hongguang MINIEV: A New Breed of Chinese Automaker. Harvard Business School Publishing.

Xue, C., Huaguo, Z., Qunqi, W., Xueying, W., Xingbo, X. 2021. Impact of incentive policies and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle market share: A panel data analysis from the 20 countries. Sustainability, 13(5), 2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052928.

Yao, X., Ma, S., Bai, Y., Ning J. 2022. When are new energy vehicle incentives effective? Empirical evidence from 88 pilot cities in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 165: 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.003.

How to Cite
Al QodriM. I., & Widyastutik. (2023). EMISI ENERGI DAN KEBIJAKAN KENDARAAN LISTRIK: STUDI KOMPARASI ANTARA CHINA DAN INDONESIA. RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian Dan Lingkungan, 10(3), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i3.48350