Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 8, 2019
Published
Aug 8, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1513 Download : 545

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract
Researches on glazed and unglazed flat plate type solar collectors have been carried out previously for the purposes of water heaters and air heaters. However, studies related to the comparison of glazed and unglazed solar collectors especially to heat air suitable for rice drying have not been carried out yet. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of glazed and unglazed solar collectors in the same weather conditions to heating the water for various water flow rates and inlet temperatures. The research approach used in this study is the experimental approach. Parameters measured include inlet temperature, outlet temperature, ambient temperature, flow rate, wind speed, and irradiation. The collector test uses four collectors (two unglazed and two glazed). The test results show that the highest efficiency is shown by
the glazed collectors, which is 63%, while the unglazed collector efficiency is 54%. Both of the efficiencies occured at a flow rate of 3 liters/minute, inlet temperature of 40°C and at noon time. The cost per watt (useful energy) of glazed flat plate solar collector was less than unglazed flat plate solar collector.

Abstrak
Salah satu cara untuk memanfaatkan energi surya adalah dengan menggunakan kolektor surya sebagai alat untuk mengubah energi matahari menjadi energi panas. Penelitian tentang kolektor surya tipe plat datar glazed dan unglazed telah dilakukan sebelumnya untuk keperluan pemanas air dan pemanas udara. Namun, studi yang terkait dengan kombinasi kolektor surya glazed dan unglazed khususnya yang akan digunakan untuk pemanasan udara yang sesuai dengan gabah belum dilakukan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan kinerja kolektor surya glazed dan unglazed dalam kondisi cuaca yang sama
untuk memanaskan air pada berbagai laju aliran air dan suhu inlet. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan eksperimental, dimana data diperoleh dari proses pengukuran di lapangan. Parameter yang diukur meliputi suhu inlet, suhu outlet, suhu lingkungan, laju aliran, kecepatan angin dan iradiasi surya. Pengujian kolektor menggunakan empat buah kolektor (dua glazed dan dua unglazed). Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa pada kolektor glazed, efisiensi tertingginya adalah 63%, sedangkan kolektor unglazed adalah 54%. Kedua efisiensi tersebut terjadi laju aliran 3 liter/menit dan suhuinlet 40°C dan waktu tengah hari. Biaya per watt (energi berguna) kolektor surya pelat datar glazed lebih rendah daripada kolektor surya pelat datar unglazed.

Keywords

glazed and unglazed solar collector solar collector efficiency useful energy inlet temperature flow rate

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Author Biographies

Rustam Efendi, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Program Studi Teknik Mesin Pertanian dan Pangan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Leopold Oscar Nelwan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Departemen Teknik Mesin dan Biosistem, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Dyah Wulandani, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Departemen Teknik Mesin dan Biosistem, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

References

  1. Agbo S., E. Okoroigwe. 2007. Analysis of
  2. thermal losses in the flat-plate collector of a
  3. Thermosyphon Solar water Heater. R J Phys
  4. 1(1):35-41.
  5. Akhtar N., S.C. Mullick. 2012. Effect of absorption of
  6. solar radiation in glass-cover(s) on heat transfer
  7. coefficients in upward heat flow in single and
  8. double glazed flat-plate collectors. Int J Heat
  9. Mass Tran 55(1-3):125-132. doi:10.1016/j.
  10. ijheatmasstransfer.2011.08.048
  11. Al-damook A., W.H. Khalil. 2017. Experimental
  12. evaluation of an unglazed solar air collector for
  13. building space heating in Iraq. Renew Energ
  14. 112:498-509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
  15. renene.2017.05.051
  16. [ASHRAE ] American Society of Heating. 2003.
  17. Methods of Testing to Determine the Thermal
  18. Performance of Solar Collectors, Refrigeration,
  19. and Air Conditioning Engineers. Atlanta [GA].
  20. Arata, A.A., R.W. Geddes. 1985. Combination
  21. of flat-plate solar collectors of different
  22. performance. Int J Sol Energ 3(6):355-371.
  23. doi:10.1080/01425918508914404
  24. Bakari, R., R.J.A., Minja, K.N. Njau. 2014. Effect of
  25. glass thickness on performance of flat plate solar
  26. collectors for fruits drying. J Energy 2014:1-8.
  27. doi:10.1155/2014/247287
  28. Belessiotis, V., E. Delyannis. 2011. Solar drying.
  29. Sol Energy 85(8):1665-1691. doi:10.1016/j.
  30. solener.2009.10.001
  31. Cengel, Y.A., A.J. Ghajar. 2003. Heat and Mass
  32. Transfer : Fundamentals & Applications. 5thEd.
  33. McGraw-Hill Education. New York
  34. Duffie, J.A., W.A. Beckman. 1980. Solar Engineering
  35. Of Thermal Processes. 4thEd. J Wiley. New York
  36. Gupta, H.K., G.D. Agrawal, J. Mathur. 2015.
  37. Investigations for effect of Al2O3–H2O nanofluid
  38. flow rate on the efficiency of direct absorption solar
  39. collector. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
  40. 5:70-78. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2015.01.002
  41. Iceri, D.M., S.D.R. Oliveira, V.L. Scalon. 2013.
  42. Comparative analysis for glazed and unglazed
  43. collector for used in solar domestic hot
  44. watersystems. [Internet]. 22nd International
  45. Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM
  46. 2013); November 3-7 2013; Brazile (BR): ABCM.
  47. hlm 2941-2951.
  48. Ihaddadene, N., R. Ihaddadene, A. Mahdi. 2014.
  49. Effect of glazing number on the performance of
  50. a solar thermal collector. IJSR:1-6.
  51. Kalogirou S.A. 2009. Solar Energy Engineering:
  52. Processes and Systems. Academic Press.
  53. Khalil, F.I, L.O.Nelwan, I.D.M. Subrata. 2016.
  54. Desain sistem kendali untuk pengering gabah
  55. dengan kolektor surya dan penyimpan panas.
  56. Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian 4 (1):87 - 96
  57. Kumar S., S.C. Mullick. 2010. Wind heat transfer
  58. coefficient in solar collectors in outdoor
  59. conditions. Sol Energy 84(6):956-963.
  60. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2010.03.003
  61. Kutscher, C.F., C.B. Christensen, G.M. Barker.
  62. 1993. Unglazed transpired solar collectors:
  63. Heat loss theory. J Sol Energ 115(3):182-188.
  64. doi:10.1115/1.2930047
  65. Nelwan, L.O., I.D.M. Subrata, D. Wulandani.
  66. 2017. Pengembangan pengering surya untuk
  67. gabah menggunakan optimisasi kombinasi
  68. kolektor datar glazed dan unglazed serta sistem
  69. penyimpanan termal. Prosiding Seminar Hasil-
  70. Hasil Penelitian IPB.
  71. William, T.R. 2013. Experimental Investigation
  72. of The Performance of Abuilding Integrated
  73. Thermal Solar Collector for Domestic Water
  74. Heating [Tesis]. The University of Waikato.
  75. Tirtoatmodjo, R., E.A. Handoyo. 1999. Unjuk kerja
  76. pemanas air jenis kolektor surya plat datar
  77. dengan satu dan dua kaca penutup. J Tek Mesin
  78. 1(2):pp. 116-121.
  79. Vettrivel, H., P. Mathiazhagan. 2017. Comparison
  80. study of solar flat plate collector with single and
  81. double glazing systems. IJRER 7(1):266-274.