NILAI-NILAI KELUARGA, ADULT ATTACHMENT, MATING INTELLIGENCE, DAN PREFERENSI PEMILIHAN PASANGAN PADA DEWASA MUDA
Abstract
Ketidakcocokan dengan pasangan dalam sebuah perkawinan secara berkepanjangan akan memicu konflik yang dapat menggoyahkan keharmonisan pernikahan. Sebelum menikah, masing-masing calon pasangan seharusnya mengenali kebutuhan dan karakteristik pribadi dan calon pasangannya sehingga individu tersebut dapat menjadi versi terbaik bagi dirinya dan bertanggung jawab penuh atas pemenuhan kebutuhannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh nilai-nilai keluarga, kelekatan dewasa (adult attachment), dan kecerdasan memilih pasangan (mating intelligence) terhadap preferensi pemilihan pasangan pada dewasa muda. Penelitian dilakukan di Indonesia dengan melibatkan 250 dewasa muda yang dipilih menggunakan teknik voluntary sampling. Penyebaran kuesioner dilakukan secara daring menggunakan Google Forms yang disebarluaskan melalui media sosial terkini. Kemudian, data diolah dengan menggunakan uji deskriptif, uji beda, uji korelasi, dan analisis jalur. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa kelekatan aman memediasi antara nilai-nilai keluarga dengan kecerdasan memilih pasangan. Kecerdasan memilih pasangan memediasi antara kelekatan aman dengan preferensi baik hati/dapat dipercaya. Kecerdasan memilih pasangan memediasi antara kelekatan aman dengan preferensi pendidikan/inteligensi. Kecerdasan memilih pasangan berpengaruh terhadap preferensi status/sumber daya. Kelekatan penghindaran berpengaruh terhadap preferensi baik hati/dapat dipercaya dan religiositas/suci. Nilai-nilai keluarga berpengaruh terhadap preferensi baik hati/dapat dipercaya, daya tarik/seksualitas, status/sumber daya, pendidikan/inteligensi, dan religiositas/suci.
References
Afhami, R., & Rafiee, P. (2020). Adult attachment and long-term mate preference in Iran. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00221-0
Andretta, J. R., Worrell, F. C., Mello, Z. R., Dixson, D. D., & Baik, S. H. (2013). Demographic group differences in adolescents’ time attitudes. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.11.005
Atari, M. (2017). Assessment of long-term mate preferences in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917702459
Atari, M., Chaudhary, N., & Al-Shawaf, L. (2020). Mate preferences in three muslim-majority countries: Sex differences and personality correlates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619866187
Bajnaid, A., Veltri, G. A., Elyas, T., & Maqableh, M. (2018). A quantitative survey of online impression formation and mate preferences among Saudi users of matrimonial websites. Modern Applied Science, 12(11), 121-150. http://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n11p121
Baughman, H. M., Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., & Vernon, P. A. (2014). Liar liar pants on fire: Cheater strategies linked to the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.019
Beaussart, M. L., Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Creative activity, personality, mental illness, and short‐term mating success. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.11
Besharat, M. A. (2011). Development and validation of adult attachment inventory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 475-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.093
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Statistik Indonesia 2020. https://www.bps.go.id
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Buunk, A. P. (2015). My parents know best: No mating with members from other ethnic groups. Interpersonal, 9(1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v9i1.184
Campos, B., Perez, O. F. R., & Guardino, C. (2016). Familism: A cultural value with implications for romantic relationship quality in U.S. Latinos. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514562564
Campos, B., Ullman, J. B., Aguilera, A., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (2014). Familism and psychological health: The intervening role of closeness and social support. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034094
Chia, R. C., Wuensch, K. L., Childers, J., Chuang, C., Cheng, B., Cesar-Romero, J., & Nava, S. (1994). A comparison of family values among Chinese, Mexican, and American college students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(2), 249-258. https://core.ecu.edu/wuenschk/Articles/FamilyValues/FamilyValues.htm
Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Why is age so important in human mating? Evolved age preferences and their influences on multiple mating behaviors. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 127-157. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000127
Dillon, H. M., Adair, L. E., Geher, G., Wang, Z., & Strouts, P. H. (2015). Playing smart: The mating game and mating intelligence. Current Psychology, 35(3), 414-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9309-y
Eastwick, P. W., & Neff, L. A. (2012). Do ideal partner preferences predict divorce? A tale of two metrics. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 667-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611435941
Fales, M. R., Frederick, D. A., Garcia, J. R., Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national U.S. studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.041
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2016). Personality: Classic theory and modern research (6th ed.). Pearson Education Incorporated.
Geher, G. (2009). Accuracy and oversexualization in cross-sex mind-reading: An adaptationist approach. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700214
Geher, G., & Kaufman, S. B. (2007). The mating intelligence scale. Psychology Today, 40, 78-79.
Geher, G., & Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Mating intelligence unleashed: The role of the mind in sex, dating, and love. Oxford University Press.
Geher, G., & Miller, G. (2008). Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships and the mind’s reproductive system. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gisler, S., & Wade, T. J. (2015). The role of intelligence in mating: An investigation of how mating intelligence relates to mate selection and mating-relevant constructs. Human Ethology Bulletin, 30(4), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.22330/heb/304/008-022
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Iglesias-Hoyos, S., & Del Castillo Arreola, A. (2017). Alexitimia y estilos de apego: Relación y diferencias por género y carreras universitarias. Psicología Iberoamericana, 25(2), 26-34.
Kamble, S., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Indian mate preferences: Continuity, sex differences, and cultural change across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.024
Krisnatuti, D., & Oktaviani, V. (2011). Persepsi dan kesiapan menikah pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 4(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2011.4.1.30
Parsaei, M. K., Refahi, Z., & Zaker, B. S. (2014). Predicted mate selection on the basis of personality characteristic and attachment styles. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 3(9), 1077-1081.
Peterson, A. (2011). Variability in mating strategies: Do individual differences in dispositional traits predict sexual preferences? [Masters thesis, SUNY New Paltz]. SUNY Open Access Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/649
Sari, F., & Sunarti, E. (2013). Kesiapan menikah pada dewasa muda dan pengaruhnya terhadap usia menikah. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 6(3), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2013.6.3.143
Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.053
Spielmann, S. S., Maxwell, J. A., MacDonald, G., & Baratta, P. L. (2013). Don’t get your hopes up: Avoidantly attached individuals perceive lower social reward when there is potential for intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472541
Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P.,… Zupančič, M. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 408-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904154
Yousefi, N., & Bagheryan, M. (2012). The investigation of the criteria of spouse selecting and marital burnout as forwarded variants in couples applicant for divorce and couples desirous of continuing the marital status. Family Counseling & Psychotherapy, 1(3), 284-301. https://fcp.uok.ac.ir/article_9459.html?lang=en
Yu, W., & Hertog, E. (2018). Family characteristics and mate selection: Evidence from computer-assisted dating in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12473
Zastrow, C., & Kirst-Ashman, K. (2015). Empowerment series: Understanding human behavior and the social environment (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts published are held Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen. The statement to release the copyright to Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen is stated in Copyright Release Form. Copyright encompass exclusive rights to reproduce, to distribute, and to sell any part of the journal articles in all form and media. The reproduction of any part of this journal is allowed with a written permission from Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen.
