Multilevel Governance in Strengthening Job and Business Opportunities in East Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara
Abstract
The progress of development and tourism in East Lombok Regency results in a need for labour and demands the mindset of society to be able to keep up with changes. Institutions of local communities such as pesantren (Islamic boarding school) and non-formal educational institutions provide services to the community for increasing competence. The community encourages the society to play a role in filling job and business opportunities and maintaining local wisdom. Community activities attract other actors from various levels, both government and private, to offer collaboration as an instrument to achieve goals. The community’s expectation of collaboration is synergizing, not delegating bureaucratic affairs. This approach offers an inclusive and participatory relationship within the Multilevel Governance (MLG). This study uses a qualitative approach with a constructivism paradigm. Data collections was carried by observation, interview, and documentation. The aim of the research is to see how the community's expectations of the MLG approach are in strengthening job and business opportunities and how the community's SOAR strategy analysis maintains the sustainability. The results of the study show that the awareness of the actors in carrying out their roles and authorities creates a conducive environment for the community to be independent. The strategy SOAR analysis is in the OA quadrant, advantage of opportunities to achieve expectations by developing partnerships that create participatory dialogue to strengthen accessibility and support local potential
References
Adesetiani, S., Kolopaking, L. M., & Eriyatno. (2022). Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Wisata Homestay Berbasis Komunitas di Kabupaten Raja Ampat, Provinsi Papua Barat. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 10(01). https://doi.org/10.22500/9202136386
Barlan, Z. A., Kolopaking, L. M., & Satyawan, S. (2014). Peran Paguyuban dalam Pembangunan Kawasan Desa. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 02(02), 115–123.
Bevir, M. (2009). Key Concept in Governance (1st ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
BPS Kabupaten Lombok Timur. (2022). Lombok Timur dalam Angka 2022. https://lomboktimurkab.bps.go.id/publication/2022/02/25/4347ad934ba6d462c4aef65e/kabupaten-lombok-timur-dalam-angka-2022.html
Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Cargnello, D. P., & Flumian, M. (2017). Canadian Governance in transition: Multilevel Governance in the digital era. Canadian Public Administration, 60(04), 605–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12230
Conteh, C. (2020). Multilevel Governance Through a Str ategic Lens: Innovation Policy Delivery in Ontario. Canadian Public Administration, 63(3), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12383
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research (3 rd). Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Daniell, Katherine., & Kay, Adrian. (2017). Multi - level Governanve: An Introduce. Multi-level Governance: Conceptual challenges and case studies from Australia (pp.3-32) DOI:10.22459/MG.11.2017.01
Dressel, S., Johansson, M., Ericsson, G., & Sandström, C. (2020). Perceived adaptive capacity within a multi-level governance setting: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Environmental Science and Policy, 104, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.11.011
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrated Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Eriyanto. (2015). Analisis Isi: Pengantar Metodologi untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Prenada Media.
Gunawan, I. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Praktik. Bumi Aksara.
Imperial, M. T., Johnson, E., Jones, M. P., Leong, K., & Thomsen, J. (2016). Sustaining the useful life of network governance: life cycles and developmental challenges. ESA Journals, 14(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1249
Knox, S., & Arshed, N. (2021). Network Governance and cooedination of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. Regional Studies Journal, 56(7), 1161–1175. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00343404. 2021. 1988067
Melica, G. B., Kona, P., Lancu, A., Rivas, A., Zancanella, S., & Paolo. (2018). Multilevel Governance of Sustainable Energy Policies: The Role of Regions and Provinces to Support the Participation of Small Local Authorities in the Covenant of Mayors. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.013
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Mladenovic, L., Plevnik, A., & Rye, T. (2022). Implementing National Support Programmes for Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans in a Multilevel Governance Context. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(3), 1686–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.06.007
Myers, R., Sanders, A. J. P., Larson, A. M., Prasti, H., Din., R., & Ravikumar, A. (2016). Menganalisis Tata kelola Multilevel di Indonesia:Pelajaran untuk REDD+ dari penelitian perubahan tata guna lahan di Kalimantan Tengah dan Kalimantan Barat. In Working Paper 212. https://doi.org/10.17528/CIFOR/006277
Piattoni, S. (2010). The Theory of Multi-level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562923.001.0001
Stavros, J., Cooperider, D. L., & Kelley, D. L. (2003). Strategic Inquiry! Appreciative Intent: Inspiration to SOAR A New Framework for Strategic Planning. International Journal of Appreciative Inquiry, 5, 10–17.
Sue, K., Brian, M., & Rhonda, P. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Community Development Perspectives from Around the Globe (S. Kenny, B. McGrath, & R. Phillips (eds.)). Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. PT Alfabet.
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive Sampling as a tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/ERA.5.0.147-158
Yesilkagit, K., & Jordana, J. (2022). Entangled Agencies and Embedded Preferences: National Regulatory Agencies in Multilevel European Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(10), 1677–1697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2103170
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
