Analisa Perbandingan Model Birokrasi Indonesia: Model Modern David Osborne, Ted Gaebler dan Pendekatan Konsep Islam Perspektif Umer Chapra

Main Article Content

Yulizar D Sanrego
Reza Muhammad

Abstract

The inefficiency of public service in Indonesia is one of the results of bad
bureaucracy, so that the development system becomes stagnant. On the contrary, sustainable
development is a reflection of a good bureaucracy. So far Indonesia is still ranked 100th out of
182 countries in the world for corruption. This paper aims to find out the bureaucratic model in
Indonesia within the framework of modern bureaucratic model as well as Islamic Concept
approach of Chapra’s perspectives. Using content analysis, the paper found that Indonesian
bureaucracy model still embrace patrimonial concept that vulnerable to the practice of
collusion, corruption and nepotism. While the modern model of Osborne and Gaebler
Entrepreneurial Bureaucracy concept with the spirit of innovation and creativity has brought a
good change and it is in line with Islamic model of Chapra’sperspective. Chapradescribes that
the development of a country should be run simultaneously with the bureaucracy that promotes
Islamic values, moral, and hard work. It is concluded that by applying this concept,
bureaucracy in Indonesia will be more effective in removing socio-economic problem and will
come up with more efficient and sustainable development dimensions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Al Qur’anKarim. 2008. Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia
Chapra, U. 2000. Islam dan Pembangunan Ekonomi. Gema Insani Press: Jakarta.
____________2000. Islam dan Tantangan Ekonomi. Gema Insani Press: Jakarta.
Damanhuri, D. S. 2010. Ekonomi Politik da Pembangunan “Teori, Kritik, dan Solusi Bagi Indonesia dan Negara Sedang Berkembang. IPB Press: Bogor.
____________2006. Korupsi, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Masa Depan Ekonomi Indonesia. LP – FEUI: Jakarta.
____________2009. INDONESIA : Negara, Civil Society dan Pasar dalam Kemelut Globalisasi. LP – FEUI: Jakarta.
____________2008. Indonesia, Globalisasi Perekonomian & Kejahatan International. Workings Paper No. 13/A/III/2008. Guru Besar Departemen Ilmu ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Prasojo, E. dan T. Kurniawan. Reformasi Birokrasi dan Good Governance: Best Practices Dari Sejumlah Daerah. Working Paper Fak. Ilmu Sosial & Politik Universitas Indonesia. Tulisan ini dipresentasikan Dalam 5th International Simposium Journal Of Antropologi at Banjarmasin 2008.
Etzioni, E. dan Halevy. 2011. Demokrasi dan Birokrasi “Sebuah dilema Politik”. Total Media: Jakarta.
Hezam, M. O. A. Ethics Of Administration and Development In Islam : A Comparative Perspective. Journal King Saudi Univ. Vol. 14, Admin. Set (1), pp. 49 -64, Riyadh (1422/2002).
Ma’ab, M. H. dan M. Fauzan. Konsep Masyarakat Madani sebagai solusi Mewujudkan Tata Pemerintahan yang Baik. Magister Ilmu Administrasi UNSOED. Telah dipresentasikan pada Simposium Nasional Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara (SIMNAS ASIAN) ke – 2 di Univ. Slamet Riyadi Surakarta, pada tanggal 10 Februari 2012.
Mahmudi (Fak. Ekonomi UII). 2003. New Public Management (NPM): Pendekatan Baru Manajemen Publik. Vol. 6 No. 1, 2003. Hal: 69 – 76. ISSN : 1410 – 9018.
Sarundajang, H. 2012. Birokrasi dalam Otonomi Daerah “Upaya Mengatasi Kegagalan”. Kata Penerbit: Jakarta.
Zahrah, A. 2008. Ushul Fiqh. Pustaka Firdaus: Jakarta.