Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Pengembangan Usahatani Labu Madu di Kabupaten Pandeglang Provinsi Banten

Main Article Content

Khaerul Saleh

Abstract

Besides having a high economic value, Pumpkin honey also has good nutritional content, technically honey pumpkin cultivation is no different from other plants, but in pumpkin, honey cultivation requires a higher investment, especially at variable costs, this study was conducted in Pandeglang district, in general, it is suitable for pumpkin honey cultivation. The objectives of this study include to: (1) Financial feasibility of pumpkin honey farming. (2) The rate of sensitivity (sensitivity) to the decline in selling prices, increase in production costs and decrease in the amount of production (3) The feasibility of the aspects of cultivation, social environment, economics and marketing of Pumpkin Honey. tabulation and computational methods to facilitate analysis. Data analysis uses quantitative analysis and qualitative descriptive analysis. Quantitative analysis analyzes financial feasibility (B/C Ratio, NPV, IRR and PBP) and sensitivity analysis using applicable interest rates, qualitative descriptive analysis is used to determine the feasibility of cultivation, social environmental, economic and marketing aspects. The results showed that (1) Honey Pumpkin Cultivation in Cipeucang and Cimanuk Subdistricts of Pandeglang Regency was feasible to be cultivated with Gross B/C Ratio, Net B/C Ratio, NPV.IRR and Payback Period (PBP) feasible. (2) The possibility of a decrease in production, a decrease in output prices, and an increase in production costs, according to investment criteria and in a proper condition, and have a good level of sensitivity. (3) The technical aspects of cultivation from climate and rainfall following the Pumpkin Honey plant, the social and environmental aspects are feasible, the marketing aspects are feasible and very promising.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saleh, K. (2020). Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Pengembangan Usahatani Labu Madu di Kabupaten Pandeglang Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia (Journal of Indonesian Agribusiness), 8(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2020.8.2.131-141
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Khaerul Saleh, Jurusan Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Banten

Jl. Raya Jakarta KM 4 , Pakupatan Serang Banten, Indonesia

References

Ardana, K.B., Pramudya, M.H. dan Tambunan, A.H. 2008. Pengembangan tanaman jarak pagar (Jatropha Curcas L) mendukung kawasan mandiri energi di Nusa Penida, Bali. Jurnal Littri 14 (4) : 155-161.

Arikunto S. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Astanu DA. 2013. Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Budidaya Intensif Tanaman Pala di Kecamatan Gisting Kabupaten Tanggamus. JIIA Vol 1: No 3 : 1-8.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik 2008. Produktivitas, produsi dan luas panen jagung. http//: bps.go.id/sector/jagung/table1. shtml. [11 Mei 2008].

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Pandeglang. 2017. Pandeglang dalam Angka. Pandeglang.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Banten 2014. Banten Dalam Angka. Banten.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Banten 2017. Banten Dalam Angka. Banten.

Bank Indonesia. 2019. Angka Inflansi Tahun 2019. Jakarta.

Blank, L. dan Anthony, T. 2002. Engineering Economy,5thed. Mc.Graw Hill, New York.

De Garmo,E.E., Paul, W.G., Sullivan dan Canada, J.R. 1984. Engineering Economic, 7thed. Mac MillanPub.Co, New York.

Diatin, I., Sobari, M.P. dan Irianni, R. 2007. Analisis kelayakan finansial budidaya ikan nila wanayasa pada kelompok pembudidaya mekarsari. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia 6(1): 97-102.

Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan dan Hortikultura 2018. Data Produksi Hortikultura Pandeglang. Provinsi Banten.

Erlina 2006. Analisis perancangan agroindustri berbasis karet. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen 3(1):73-92.

Fazwa, M.A.F., Fauzi, P.A., Ab, A.G., Rasip dan Noor, M.M. 2001. A preliminary analysis on financial assessment of
Citrushystrix (limau purut) grown on plantation basis, Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), 52109 Kepong, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Project No. 01- 04-01-0094-EA001.

Firmansyah, B.A., Veronika, A. dan Trigunarsyah, B. 2006. Risk Analysis in feasibility study of building construction project: case study- PT. Perusahaan Gas Negara Indonesia. The Tenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, Bangkok, Thailand Tahun 2006. Bangkok 3-5 Agustus, Thailand.

Gittinger JP dan Hans AA. 1993. Evaluasi Proyek. Jakarta.

Idham, A., Lestari, T. dan Adriani, D. 2010. Analisis finansial sistem usaha tani terpadu (integrated farming system) berbasis ternak sapi di kabupaten oganilir. Jurnal Pembangunan Manusia 6. http://balitbangdasumsel.net/data/download/ 20100414125413.pdf. [3 April 2011].

Kadariah. 2001. Evaluasi Proyek Analisa Ekonomi. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Kusuma, P.T.W.W., Arbita, K.D., Putri, S.A. dan Maryani, N.F. 2010. Financial analysis pengembangan usaha kecil menengah (UKM) produsen flakes ubi jalar (emergency food) (studi kasus UKM mandiri pangan mapan
makmur, Gunung Kidul). Seminar on Application and Research in Industrial Technology 2010 (SMART): C1-C6. Yogyakarta, 29 Juli 2010 : Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.

Kusumanto, I. 2008. Net present value (NPV) internal dan rate of return (IRR). http://kuliahft. umm.ac.id/ pluginfile.php/171/ mod_folder/ content/1/Ekonomi%20Teknik/5.%20NPV%20IRR. ppt?forcedownload=1. [28 Agustus 2013].

Logistik Bimbingan Pupuk Dan Pemupukan Indonesia. 2016. Acuan pupuk dan pemupukan labu madu/butternutsquash. http://booslem.com/ budi daya-butternut-labu-madu/. Diunduh September 2018

Mc Keough, P., Solantausta, Y., KyllĖ†nen, H., Faaij, A., Hamelinck, C., Wagener, M., Beckman, D. dan Kjellstrom, B. 2005. Techno-economic analysis of biotradechains. Upgraded Biofuels from Russia and Canada to the Netherlands Espoo 2005. Research VTT Tiedotteita. Research Notes 2312. pp. 25.

Pujawan, I.N.(2004). Ekonomi Teknik. Penerbit Guna Widya, Surabaya.

Rantala, J., Harstela, V.M., Saarinen dan Tervo, L. 2009. ATechno-Economic Evaluation of Bracke and M-PlanterTree Planting Devices. Research Article the Finnish Society of Forest Science ISSN 0037-5330. The Finnish Forest Research Institute Silva Fennica: p 43(4).

Redaksi24.Com 2019. Agrowisata alam Pandeglang, b Koran Online

Rizana, D. 2014. Analisis Penentuan Harga Pokok Produksi dan Kelayakan Finansial Pepaya Kalifornia di Kabupaten Pandeglang. JIIA Vol 2: No 3 : 1-9.

Seftiana, L. 2010. Analisis Kelayakan Usahatani Pepaya di Desa Blendung, Kecamatan Purwadadi Kabupaten Subang. JMA IPB Vol 3 : No 2 : 1-6.

Sudong, Y. dan Tiong, R.L.K. 2002. NPV-at risk method in infrastructure project investment evaluation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 126(3): 227-233.

Surahman, D.N., Astro, H.M. dan Priyatna, H. 2007. Business Plan: Kajian Bisnis Agroindustri, Studi Kasus Usaha Kecil Menengah Nanas. LIPI Press, Jakarta.

Sutojo, S. (2000). Studi Kelayakan Proyek, Teori dan Praktek. Gramedia, Jakarta.